Overview
About vulnerability
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dm thin: Fix UAF in run_timer_softirq()
When dm_resume() and dm_destroy() are concurrent, it will lead to UAF, as follows:
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __run_timers+0x173/0x710
Write of size 8 at addr ffff88816d9490f0 by task swapper/0/0
One of the concurrency UAF can be shown as below:
use free do_resume | __find_device_hash_cell | dm_get | atomic_inc(&md->holders) | | dm_destroy | __dm_destroy | if (!dm_suspended_md(md)) | atomic_read(&md->holders) | msleep(1) dm_resume | __dm_resume | dm_table_resume_targets | pool_resume | do_waker #add delay work | dm_put | atomic_dec(&md->holders) | | dm_table_destroy | pool_dtr | __pool_dec | __pool_destroy | destroy_workqueue | kfree(pool) # free pool time out __do_softirq run_timer_softirq # pool has already been freed
This can be easily reproduced using:
- create thin-pool
- dmsetup suspend pool
- dmsetup resume pool
- dmsetup remove_all # Concurrent with 3
The root cause of this UAF bug is that dm_resume() adds timer after dm_destroy() skips cancelling the timer because of suspend status. After timeout, it will call run_timer_softirq(), however pool has already been freed. The concurrency UAF bug will happen.
Therefore, cancelling timer again in __pool_destroy().
Details
- Affected product:
- AlmaLinux 9.2 ESU , CentOS 8.4 ELS , CentOS 8.5 ELS , CentOS Stream 8 ELS , TuxCare 9.6 ESU
- Affected packages:
- kernel @ 4.18.0 (+4 more)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dm thin: Fix UAF in run_timer_softirq()
When dm_resume() and dm_destroy() are concurrent, it will lead to UAF, as follows:
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __run_timers+0x173/0x710
Write of size 8 at addr ffff88816d9490f0 by task swapper/0/0
One of the concurrency UAF can be shown as below:
use free do_resume | __find_device_hash_cell | dm_get | atomic_inc(&md->holders) | | dm_destroy | __dm_destroy | if (!dm_suspended_md(md)) | atomic_read(&md->holders) | msleep(1) dm_resume | __dm_resume | dm_table_resume_targets | pool_resume | do_waker #add delay work | dm_put | atomic_dec(&md->holders) | | dm_table_destroy | pool_dtr | __pool_dec | __pool_destroy | destroy_workqueue | kfree(pool) # free pool time out __do_softirq run_timer_softirq # pool has already been freed
This can be easily reproduced using:
- create thin-pool
- dmsetup suspend pool
- dmsetup resume pool
- dmsetup remove_all # Concurrent with 3
The root cause of this UAF bug is that dm_resume() adds timer after dm_destroy() skips cancelling the timer because of suspend status. After timeout, it will call run_timer_softirq(), however pool has already been freed. The concurrency UAF bug will happen.
Therefore, cancelling timer again in __pool_destroy().