Overview
About vulnerability
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: fix EEXIST abort due to non-consecutive gaps in chunk allocation
I have been observing a number of systems aborting at insert_dev_extents() in btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(). The following is a sample stack trace of such an abort coming from forced chunk allocation (typically behind CONFIG_BTRFS_EXPERIMENTAL) but this can theoretically happen to any DUP chunk allocation.
[81.801] ————[ cut here ]————
[81.801] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -17)
[81.801] WARNING: fs/btrfs/block-group.c:2876 at btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x721/0x770 [btrfs], CPU#1: bash/319
[81.802] Modules linked in: virtio_net btrfs xor zstd_compress raid6_pq null_blk
[81.803] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 319 Comm: bash Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.19.0-rc6+ #319 NONE
[81.803] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Arch Linux 1.17.0-2-2 04/01/2014
[81.804] RIP: 0010:btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x723/0x770 [btrfs]
[81.806] RSP: 0018:ffffa36241a6bce8 EFLAGS: 00010282
[81.806] RAX: 000000000000000d RBX: ffff8e699921e400 RCX: 0000000000000000
[81.807] RDX: 0000000002040001 RSI: 00000000ffffffef RDI: ffffffffc0608bf0
[81.807] RBP: 00000000ffffffef R08: ffff8e69830f6000 R09: 0000000000000007
[81.808] R10: ffff8e699921e5e8 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8e6999228000
[81.808] R13: ffff8e6984d82000 R14: ffff8e69966a69c0 R15: ffff8e69aa47b000
[81.809] FS: 00007fec6bdd9740(0000) GS:ffff8e6b1b379000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[81.809] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[81.810] CR2: 00005604833670f0 CR3: 0000000116679000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
[81.810] Call Trace:
[81.810]
Inspecting these aborts with drgn, I observed a pattern of overlapping chunk_maps. Note how stripe 1 of the first chunk overlaps in physical address with stripe 0 of the second chunk.
Physical Start Physical End Length Logical Type Stripe
0x0000000102500000 0x0000000142500000 1.0G 0x0000000641d00000 META|DUP 0/2 0x0000000142500000 0x0000000182500000 1.0G 0x0000000641d00000 META|DUP 1/2 0x0000000142500000 0x0000000182500000 1.0G 0x0000000601d00000 META|DUP 0/2 0x0000000182500000 0x00000001c2500000 1.0G 0x0000000601d00000 META|DUP 1/2
Now how could this possibly happen? All chunk allocation is —truncated—
Details
- Affected product:
- CentOS 7 ELS
- Affected packages:
- kernel @ 3.10.0
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: fix EEXIST abort due to non-consecutive gaps in chunk allocation
I have been observing a number of systems aborting at insert_dev_extents() in btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(). The following is a sample stack trace of such an abort coming from forced chunk allocation (typically behind CONFIG_BTRFS_EXPERIMENTAL) but this can theoretically happen to any DUP chunk allocation.
[81.801] ————[ cut here ]————
[81.801] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -17)
[81.801] WARNING: fs/btrfs/block-group.c:2876 at btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x721/0x770 [btrfs], CPU#1: bash/319
[81.802] Modules linked in: virtio_net btrfs xor zstd_compress raid6_pq null_blk
[81.803] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 319 Comm: bash Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.19.0-rc6+ #319 NONE
[81.803] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Arch Linux 1.17.0-2-2 04/01/2014
[81.804] RIP: 0010:btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x723/0x770 [btrfs]
[81.806] RSP: 0018:ffffa36241a6bce8 EFLAGS: 00010282
[81.806] RAX: 000000000000000d RBX: ffff8e699921e400 RCX: 0000000000000000
[81.807] RDX: 0000000002040001 RSI: 00000000ffffffef RDI: ffffffffc0608bf0
[81.807] RBP: 00000000ffffffef R08: ffff8e69830f6000 R09: 0000000000000007
[81.808] R10: ffff8e699921e5e8 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8e6999228000
[81.808] R13: ffff8e6984d82000 R14: ffff8e69966a69c0 R15: ffff8e69aa47b000
[81.809] FS: 00007fec6bdd9740(0000) GS:ffff8e6b1b379000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[81.809] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[81.810] CR2: 00005604833670f0 CR3: 0000000116679000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
[81.810] Call Trace:
[81.810]
Inspecting these aborts with drgn, I observed a pattern of overlapping chunk_maps. Note how stripe 1 of the first chunk overlaps in physical address with stripe 0 of the second chunk.
Physical Start Physical End Length Logical Type Stripe
0x0000000102500000 0x0000000142500000 1.0G 0x0000000641d00000 META|DUP 0/2 0x0000000142500000 0x0000000182500000 1.0G 0x0000000641d00000 META|DUP 1/2 0x0000000142500000 0x0000000182500000 1.0G 0x0000000601d00000 META|DUP 0/2 0x0000000182500000 0x00000001c2500000 1.0G 0x0000000601d00000 META|DUP 1/2
Now how could this possibly happen? All chunk allocation is —truncated—