Comparing KernelCare Enterprise to Red Hat Kpatch

Live Linux kernel patching is transforming SecOps, but is Red Hat’s Kpatch the best choice for your workloads?

Struggling with maintenance windows, and worried about imperfect patching mechanisms and the impact on your Red Hat security ops? Live Linux kernel patching, also known as hot patching, is the answer to both challenges – but not every live kernel patching tool is created the same.

Most enterprise Linux vendors have rolled out live patching tools – including Red Hat’s tool for Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), called Kpatch. Adopting live patching is now cybersecurity best practice and using the best tool for your needs is critical.

Kpatch applies changes to the kernel while it is running and thereby mitigates the challenges around maintenance windows. It’s been supporting Red Hat-based server workloads since the earliest version of Kpatch in 2014, but it has its pros and cons. Let’s take a look.

Content Table

1. Introducing Kpatch dynamic kernel patching
2. Difference between temporary and persistent Linux kernel patching
3. Supported Linux kernels
4. What about costs?
5. Quick Comparison Chart
6. Transitioning from the Kpatch utility to KernelCare
7. Choosing between Kpatch and KernelCare

Introducing Kpatch dynamic kernel patching

Red Hat’s decision to introduce Kpatch into the Linux kernel mainline came a little late, given that it was developed after KSplice – the MIT project – and after KernelCare, developed by the team at CloudLinux. Like its peers, Kpatch performs live patching by hot swapping a replacement function containing a patched version of the kernel code.

In other words, Kpatch allows you to apply security patches to your Red Hat-based workloads, without the need to immediately restart the server after patching. The tool was developed in-house by Red Hat, and at the outset it was similar to kGraft, a tool developed by the team over at SUSE Linux. Given how closely kGraft is related to Kpatch the two organizations decided to work together and unify their efforts.

Difference between temporary and persistent Linux kernel patching

Here’s a key point to understand about Kpatch dynamic kernel patching. When performing live patching or as it used to be called, dynamic kernel patching, there are two routes: temporary patching, and persistent patching. Kpatch relies on temporary live patching which is exactly what it says, a temporary way to install critical patches on a running workload without a reboot.

However, temporary patches are not fully integrated, and relying on ongoing temporary patching will eventually degrade performance – until a reboot of the running kernel is performed. Yes, it helps to mitigate the challenges around patching, but relying on temporary patches to kernel modules is not a perfect cure.

A better way to go about patching is persistent patching, where every kernel live patch contains a cumulative fix in one binary. Patch modules are not applied on top of each another, there’s no performance degradation and no need for system reboots. And, when it comes to patching, it can be argued that eliminating the reboots required to update the kernel version is really the primary goal.

Supported Linux kernels

Kpatch is an option for anyone that runs Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL). It’s built and maintained by Red Hat developers, after all. However, anyone running RHEL 6, or certain versions of RHEL 7 won’t be covered for hot patches by Kpatch. Only RHEL 8, 7.7, and 7.6 is supported. Some non-RHEL Linux distributions are also supported, including specific versions of Ubuntu, Debian, and Gentoo.

If you’re running a version of RHEL, Ubuntu or Debian that’s not supported by Kpatch, or indeed another Linux distribution such as CentOS or Amazon Linux, you’ll need to look towards KernelCare for live patching support.

What about costs?

Incidentally, if you opted for KernelCare Enterprise, you’ll be looking at budget-friendly pricing that comes down to less than $60/server per year. With persistent patching and support for a broad range of Linux distributions, KernelCare offers a comparatively rich feature set too.

The cost to implement Kpatch is significantly higher unless you’re already signed up for a RHEL support plan. That’s because Kpatch is only available to Red Hat customers with a Premium Support plan, and that’s $1,299 per year, per machine.